<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Firearms Truth &#187; Buy back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firearmstruth.com/tag/buy-back/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com</link>
	<description>Media bias of fireams in the crosshairs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:59:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NJ.com Does Bang Up Job Covering Local Gun Buy Back</title>
		<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2011/nj-com-does-bang-up-job-covering-local-gun-buy-back</link>
		<comments>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2011/nj-com-does-bang-up-job-covering-local-gun-buy-back#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FirearmsTruth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automatic Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buyback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firearmstruth.com/?p=7142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, what is wrong with this photo at the left? To be fair, it is credited by AP, but we have to ask what does it have to do with the NJ.com story titled “Jersey City buy-back program exceeding expectations” – because if these were the guns that were part of the buy-back we’re impressed. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_7143" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 390px"><a href="http://www.firearmstruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Guns.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-7143" title="Guns" src="http://www.firearmstruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Guns.jpg" alt="" width="380" height="590" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Not exactly what we expect to see at a gun buy-back</p></div>
<p>First, what is wrong with this photo at the left? To be fair, it is credited by AP, but we have to ask what does it have to do with the NJ.com story titled “Jersey City buy-back program exceeding expectations” – because if these were the guns that were part of the buy-back we’re impressed.</p>
<p>But the truth is that this AP photo is just a stock image. It is likely an image of guns in a museum. This essentially discredits the entire story.</p>
<p>Second, the article from this past weekend offers this passage:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">“Today, gun owners can go to two sites in Jersey City and receive $100 for every rifle and shotgun, and $150 for every handgun and automatic weapon.”</p>
<p>What exactly is meant by “automatic weapon” was have to ask? This implies that automatic weapons are common place and either the paper or the organizers show that this is really a major misunderstanding of the situation. How many illegal automatic weapons are on the streets, even in Jersey City – and more importantly, how many show up at buy-backs?</p>
<p>Together it shows that very thought went into this “feel good” anti-gun story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2011/nj-com-does-bang-up-job-covering-local-gun-buy-back/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York City Paper Calls for Gun Buy Backs</title>
		<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/new-york-city-paper-calls-for-gun-buy-backs</link>
		<comments>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/new-york-city-paper-calls-for-gun-buy-backs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FirearmsTruth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firearmstruth.com/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we respect the motivations behind The Queens Courier calling for gun buy back programs, we have to wonder if such an initiative would actually have saved Kevin Miller, the unfortunate victim of recent gun crime in New York City. Buy backs could, in fact have the opposite effect than one intended. One thing that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we respect the motivations behind <em>The Queens Courier</em> <a href="http://www.queenscourier.com/articles/2009/10/14/news/opinion/editorial/doc4ad638c85e30e362794377.txt">calling for gun buy back programs</a>, we have to wonder if such an initiative would actually have saved Kevin Miller, the unfortunate victim of recent gun crime in New York City. Buy backs could, in fact have the opposite effect than one intended. </p>
<p>One thing that is never made clear by the mainstream media is that these events don&#8217;t likely get guns out of criminals hands, but instead seem to make it seem as if they do to the general public. This could have the unexpected result of actually making some people inadvertently dropping their guard. And when that happens, bad things can be the result.</p>
<p>We would like to offer our condolences to the family of Kevin Miller, and would like to call on Mayor Mike Bloomberg to fight crime in New York City, and not try and focus so much on gun shows in other states. He is a city mayor and should be focused on things within New York City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/new-york-city-paper-calls-for-gun-buy-backs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston Herald Offers One Side in Gun Turn-In Story</title>
		<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/boston-herald-offers-one-side-in-gun-turn-in-story</link>
		<comments>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/boston-herald-offers-one-side-in-gun-turn-in-story#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FirearmsTruth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inter-Church Council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firearmstruth.com/?p=710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We wouldn&#8217;t expect the very liberal Boston Herald to do it any other way, but it is surprising that even this quote would go unchecked in a recent story that mentioned a gun turn-in program in New Bedford: &#8220;David Lima, executive director of the Inter-Church Council, tells The Standard-Times of New Bedford that every gun [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We wouldn&#8217;t expect the very liberal Boston Herald to do it any other way, but it is surprising that even this quote would go unchecked in <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20091005new_bedford_gun_buyback_program_nets_41_weapons/srvc=home&amp;position=recent" target="_blank">a recent story that mentioned a gun turn-in program in New Bedford</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;David Lima, executive director of the Inter-Church Council, tells <em>The Standard-Times of New Bedford</em> that every gun turned in means less of a chance it will fall into the wrong hands and be used for criminal activity.&#8221;<span id="more-710"></span></p>
<p>This story, which seems to have been reported in <em>The Standard-Times</em> was picked up as a local news piece on the BostonHerald.com Web site. What is disturbing about this particular statement is that no one, including the writer or editor, felt compelled to question the opinion. Is it really possible that every gun out there has a chance to be used for criminal activity? This logic would suggest that every car has the chance to be used somehow by a drunk driver. And we think most car owners would find that crazy too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/boston-herald-offers-one-side-in-gun-turn-in-story/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firing Back: My Guns Aren&#8217;t &#8220;On the Street&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/firing-back-my-guns-arent-on-the-street</link>
		<comments>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/firing-back-my-guns-arent-on-the-street#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FirearmsTruth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firing Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash for guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firearmstruth.com/?p=581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time and time again, politicians including my own mayor (Mike Bloomberg of New York City) talk about how tougher firearm laws get guns off the street. But let&#8217;s consider a few points. Nearly all my firearms are stored out of state, and I do this because it is the ONLY legal way I can keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Time and time again, politicians including my own mayor (Mike Bloomberg of New York City) talk about how tougher firearm laws get guns off the street. But let&#8217;s consider a few points. Nearly all my firearms are stored out of state, and I do this because it is the ONLY legal way I can keep these guns. So most of the year I have no access to these firearms. If I had them in New York City these would be safely locked away as well. Either way these guns would never be &#8220;on the street.&#8221;</p>
<p>There have been countless gun buy back programs across the country with the intention to &#8220;get guns off the street.&#8221; And the bigger problem is that the mainstream media continues to praise these events for helping &#8220;get guns off the street,&#8221; while at the same time labeling anyone standing up for firearm rights as a &#8220;gun nut.&#8221; The point that we&#8217;ve tried to make time and time again is that criminals probably aren&#8217;t handing in their guns for cash.</p>
<p>Worse, there have even been increases in thefts of firearms in the days leading up to such events. And why not? Most of these are events are cash for guns, no questions asked. Perfect way to score some fast money. Steal a gun, hand it in, and the evidence of the crime is melted down. The problem of course is that such firearms were never on the street. But something tells me that many criminals will continue to be on the streets and armed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/firing-back-my-guns-arent-on-the-street/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Troy Police &#8220;Try to Get Guns Off Streets&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/troy-police-try-to-get-guns-off-streets</link>
		<comments>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/troy-police-try-to-get-guns-off-streets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FirearmsTruth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash for guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firearmstruth.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one wants guns on the streets and in the hands of criminals, but the way the mainstream media keeps on reporting about it, it seems like a bigger deal than it actually is. And the latest example of this is from News10.com in Albany, New York. The site is reporting: &#8220;The Troy Police Department [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">No one wants guns on the streets and in the hands of criminals, but the way the mainstream media keeps on reporting about it, it seems like a bigger deal than it actually is. And the latest example of this is from <a href="http://www.wten.com/Global/story.asp?S=11036982" target="_blank">News10.com in Albany, New York</a>. The site is reporting:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;The Troy Police Department is trying to get guns off city streets. The department is getting ready to hold its first ever gun buyback program.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-571"></span><br />
Apparently the police are following up on an event started by the Victory Church, which &#8220;has held several gun buyback days in Albany, Schenectady and Troy. Since the creation of that program nearly 200 guns have been taken off area streets.&#8221;</p>
<p>As we&#8217;ve reported on many times, is there any proof that these guns were &#8220;taken off the streets.&#8221; In many cases, these were guns taken from under beds. And how many times do you think widows and others have sold valuable collectibles for a mere fraction what they were worth? This would be akin to handing in a valuable collectible car and getting the clunker&#8217;s value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/troy-police-try-to-get-guns-off-streets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland Gun Buy-Backs to prevent 1000 Future Murders?</title>
		<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/oakland-gun-buy-backs-to-prevent-1000-future-murders</link>
		<comments>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/oakland-gun-buy-backs-to-prevent-1000-future-murders#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Armold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firing Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun turn in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firearmstruth.com/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s an amazing headline but that&#8217;s exactly the kind of deceptive, inaccurate message organizers of Oakland&#8217;s recent gun buy-back program are trying to spin to legitimize spending $250,000. The concept of “gun buy-backs” as a methodology for reducing firearms availability and violence could only come from the minds of people who really can&#8217;t see the forest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">It&#8217;s an amazing headline but that&#8217;s exactly the kind of deceptive, inaccurate message organizers of Oakland&#8217;s recent gun buy-back program are trying to spin to legitimize spending $250,000. </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;"></p>
<div>The concept of “gun buy-backs” as a methodology for reducing firearms availability and violence could only come from the minds of people who really can&#8217;t see the forest through the trees. Consider the recent buy-back in Oakland, California that offered $250 for any working firearm, no questions asked. With a budget of $80,000 allocated, that money was handed over to gleeful sellers in minutes leaving hundreds of armed citizens (or were they criminals) lined up on a public street waiting to sell their guns. According to <em>USA Today</em>, Oakland police chief Wayne Tucker made the decision to continue to “purchase” the firearms and issued IOUs totaling some $170,000. It&#8217;s not clear where the additional $170,000 spent will come from. Despite the fact that Oakland, like most of California is broke, Democratic state Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata called the program “cathartic” reinforcing the contention that in liberal ideology results matter less than the “feel good” factor. Couple that with a complete distain for the Second Amendment and you have nearly the perfect “happy, happy, joy, joy” program.Sure, it looks great on paper but don&#8217;t expect any real results.</p>
<p><span id="more-501"></span></p>
<p>The fact is enterprising firearms dealers, collectors and enthusiasts took advantage of Oakland&#8217;s naïve initiative and unloaded thousands of dollars worth of cheap, junk guns, many worth less than the $250.00 the city was shelling out.</p>
<p>So after more than doubling their purchase budget can Oakland and the proponents of the gun buy-back program quantify any reduction in crime based on the program? No. They purchased over 1000 guns but have no idea how many were turned in by criminals. They don&#8217;t know how many of these guns were really a threat to society nor do they know how many had been used in a criminal act.</p>
<p>It begs the question, how can a municipality like Oakland look it&#8217;s taxpayers in the eye and say that 250,000 of the communities tax dollars were spent wisely buying junk guns from old ladies and gun dealers from Reno? With the current economic situation, is a touchy-feely publicity stunt really the best way to “invest” in the community? Oakland, like most communities who fall for the gun buy-back ploy, failed to even ask where they guns came from. An editorial in the <em>Oakland Tribute</em> referred to the program as a “good idea gone awry” remarking that the event turned into a glorified gun show. When asked by the media why the program wasn&#8217;t specifically targeting residents of Oakland, Senator Perata stated that wasn&#8217;t important. His message was that one less gun meant one less homicide. Well there you go. Perata and his ilk try to imply that every firearm purchased was destined to be used in a murderous act. It&#8217;s this type of intentionally misleading and irresponsible statement that led to a 2004 report by the National Research Council, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences. The report concluded that the empirical evidence demonstrated that gun buy-back programs are ineffective in reducing crime.</p>
<p>The evidence demonstrates that gun buy-back programs are more about fluff and photo-opportunities than real results. Researchers and even law enforcement agencies argue that criminals don&#8217;t participate in these feel-good programs. One has to wonder, with Oakland paying $250 per gun, does the program itself encourage increased burglary or home invasions with the specific objective of stealing guns to sell to the local government?  </p>
<p> </p></div>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/oakland-gun-buy-backs-to-prevent-1000-future-murders/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Gun Buy Back Programs Get &#8220;Guns Off the Street?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/do-gun-buy-back-programs-get-guns-off-the-street</link>
		<comments>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/do-gun-buy-back-programs-get-guns-off-the-street#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FirearmsTruth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash for guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firearmstruth.com/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the message from The Buffalo News, which reported this weekend that a gun buy back program helped &#8220;get 711 guns off the street.&#8221; That was the headline, so we can&#8217;t (necessarily) blame the staff writer for that bit of reporting. On the positive side the article did include this fact, which we glad to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">That&#8217;s the message from <em>The Buffalo News</em>, <a href="http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/story/765171.html" target="_blank">which reported this weekend that a gun buy back program helped &#8220;get 711 guns off the street.&#8221; </a>That was the headline, so we can&#8217;t (necessarily) blame the staff writer for that bit of reporting. On the positive side the article did include this fact, which we glad to see:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;Some studies show the programs are ineffective at lowering crime rates and getting potentially harmful weapons off the streets.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;In 2000, Lawrence Sherman, a University of Pennsylvania criminology professor, conducted a study for the U. S. Department of Justice and noted there was no direct correlation between gun buyback programs and the reduction of crime.&#8221;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span id="more-495"></span></p>
<p>Now if only the rest of the media reporting on this trend realized this was the case. Unfortunately other news coverage of this buy back event, including of <a href="http://www.wkbw.com/news/local/53309552.html" target="_blank">WKBW failed to note the possible lack of effectiveness of these programs</a>. The local station instead took time to only praise the efforts:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;A gun buyback program is being hailed a success by city officials but some residents are troubled by the recent spike in violence, including two shootings in Buffalo in the last 24 hours.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wivb.com/dpp/news/Success_in_Gun_Buyback_Program_20090815" target="_blank">Likewise WIVB also was fairly one sided with it&#8217;s coverage</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;The crime curbing effort has collected over 1,600 guns over the past 2 years and city leaders said this is another successful year.&#8221;</p>
<p>And later in the article pointed out:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;Some say that the Gun Buyback Program couldn&#8217;t come at a better time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/do-gun-buy-back-programs-get-guns-off-the-street/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Gun Buy Back: Was it a Success or Failure?</title>
		<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/chicago-gun-buy-back-was-it-a-success-or-failure</link>
		<comments>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/chicago-gun-buy-back-was-it-a-success-or-failure#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FirearmsTruth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash for guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firearmstruth.com/?p=493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend the Chicago Police Department had a gun buy back program, and WITN called the &#8220;program a success,&#8221; but was it really? The Chicago Sun-Times reported that &#8220;5,000 fewer guns&#8221; were turned in this year compared to last year&#8217;s event. The paper noted that the buy back couldn&#8217;t really be considered a success: &#8220;This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">This weekend the Chicago Police Department had a gun buy back program, and <a href="http://www.witn.com/home/headlines/53347332.html" target="_blank">WITN called the &#8220;program a success,&#8221; but was it really</a>? The <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/1718598,CST-NWS-guns16.article" target="_blank"><em>Chicago Sun-Times</em> reported that &#8220;5,000 fewer guns&#8221; were turned in this year compared to last year&#8217;s event</a>. The paper noted that the buy back couldn&#8217;t really be considered a success:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;This year&#8217;s total &#8212; 1,887 &#8212; was significantly lower than last year&#8217;s take of 6,800 guns, officials said.&#8221;</p>
<p>This was the fifth year the program has been running. But it is interesting to note that WITN would call this year&#8217;s event &#8220;a success.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/chicago-gun-buy-back-was-it-a-success-or-failure/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS News Chicago Says Gun Turn-in Programs Do Little Good</title>
		<link>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/cbs-news-chicago-says-gun-turn-in-programs-do-little-good</link>
		<comments>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/cbs-news-chicago-says-gun-turn-in-programs-do-little-good#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FirearmsTruth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buyback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buy back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turn in]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firearmstruth.com/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, this time we&#8217;re going to praise the mainstream media for a change, or at least one of the three news departments in the Windy City. This weekend Chicago is holding a turn-in program &#8211; a.k.a. one of those guns for cash programs. While the local ABC news Web site merely announced the event, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Well, this time we&#8217;re going to praise the mainstream media for a change, or at least one of the three news departments in the Windy City. This weekend Chicago is holding a turn-in program &#8211; a.k.a. one of those guns for cash programs. While the <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;id=6963889" target="_blank">local ABC news Web</a> site merely announced the event, and the <a href="http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/Bring-Your-Guns-to-Church-53147392.html" target="_blank">NBC station</a> claimed that the event has taken &#8220;18,000 guns from the streets since 2005,&#8221; <a href="http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/gun.turn.in.2.1127786.html" target="_blank">CBS 2 in Chicago has taken the bold step of asking if these programs do any good</a>?</p>
<p>CBS 2 even has a very strong quote from a reliable source:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;Illinois Gun Works Owner Don Mastrianni claims that Chicago&#8217;s program to clear its street of guns by offering to buy them and melt them down has probably not prevented even one killing.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;&#8216;Criminals aren&#8217;t going to bring in their guns,&#8217; Mastrianni said.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the sound bites keep getting better. Police officer David Montgomery was quoted in the article, saying:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;You can always get the guns. There&#8217;s the underground market out there. What can you do about it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe the rest of the mainstream media will get the message as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.firearmstruth.com/2009/cbs-news-chicago-says-gun-turn-in-programs-do-little-good/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

