LA Times: Open Carry Not For California

We expect bias in editorials, and that’s par for the course. However, typically when editorials are written that are anti-gun the point is never clear. Case in point, in a Los Angeles Times editorial titled “Open carry: It’s not for California,” the editors offer this point:

“Carrying an unloaded gun isn’t as harmless as open carry advocates like to claim. It only takes a second to slap a clip into an unloaded semiautomatic, and an armed society is not a friendly society; angry disputes can turn deadly when the antagonists are packing heat, and untrained shooters can miss their targets and hit bystanders.”

Couldn’t it be argued that some people won’t pick a fight with another carrying a gun openly? What if you pick a fight with a person who is packing a concealed weapon (legally or illegally)? Couldn’t that end tragically as well?

Share and enjoy:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Comments

One Response to “LA Times: Open Carry Not For California”
  1. Mike says:

    Please sign the open carry petitition for California at http://www.petitiononline.com/CalOC/petition.html – and pass on to your friends and post to blogs – time is short to stop the Saldana bill!

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!