CSM Offers Anti-Gun Bias in Story About Fort Hood Shooter
Posted by Peter Suciu on November 29, 2009 · Leave a Comment
The Christian Science Monitor, a news organization that we watch regularly for their anti-gun bias, pulls no punches in an article titled: “Ft. Hood rampage raises questions about gun control.”
The article suggests that the shooter at Fort Hood earlier this month could have been stopped if the FBI had more time to do firearms background checks:
“Critics say it’s because pro-gun lawmakers, spring-loaded to oppose stronger gun control of any kind, have stymied efforts to give the FBI greater authority to look for gun purchasers who might potentially be terrorists or otherwise prone to attack innocent victims.”
What about the fact that he was regularly e-mailing known terrorist? What about the fact that soldiers on a military base don’t carry firearms? What about the fact that the shooter essentially spelled out what he was going to do? Solid reporting from the CSM yet again.
Related posts:
- Fort Hood Shooter’s Gun Labeled “Cop Killer” Is there a particular reason why ABC News chose to...
- AG Calls for Gun Control! The Law Enforcement Alliance of America has issued a press...
- Middle East Online Runs Anti-Gun Rant – What Irony Less than two weeks after the tragic shooting at Fort...
- WaPo Editorial Calls Mayor Group Bipartisan We know The Washington Post hates guns, so an anti-gun...
- Old News: No Fly Suspects Can Buy Guns File this one under old news. Robert Friedman of the...
